From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936300AbWLIOVs (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:21:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936303AbWLIOVs (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:21:48 -0500 Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA ([216.16.235.2]:45886 "EHLO rubicon.netdirect.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936300AbWLIOVr (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:21:47 -0500 X-Originating-Ip: 74.102.209.62 Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:17:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Pekka Enberg cc: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] kcalloc: Re-order the first two out-of-order args to kcalloc(). In-Reply-To: <84144f020612090613s28aeb485ua7c652393cff3f90@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <84144f020612090553n7fe309b7u54dd7f58424c4008@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020612090613s28aeb485ua7c652393cff3f90@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.8, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 12/9/06, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > argh, in that i've already mentioned that, following the guidelines in > > "SubmittingPatches", i prefer that each of my patches have one logical > > purpose. once the order of the kcalloc() args is corrected, that > > would be followed by a single subsequent patch that did the > > kcalloc->kzalloc transformation all at once. > > ...and what would that buy us? Nothing. It *really* wants to use > kzalloc and the transformation is equivalent, so please make it one > patch. no. those two submissions represent two logically different "fixes" and i have no intention of combining them. rday