Re: [PATCH/RFC] CodingStyle updates

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>]

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 12:48:38AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > +but no space after unary operators:
> > > +		sizeof  ++  --  &  *  +  -  ~  !  defined
> >
> > Uhm, that doesn't compute...  If you don't put a space after sizeof,
> > the program won't compile.
> >
> > int c;
> > printf("%d", sizeofc);
>
> Uh, we prefer not to see "sizeof c".  IOW, we prefer to have the
> parentheses use all the time.  Maybe I need to say that better?

here's a *really* rough first pass, i'm sure the end result would need
some hand tweaking:

=============================================
#!/bin/sh

DIR=$1

#
#  Put in missing parentheses.
#

for f in $(grep -Erl "sizeof [^\(]" ${DIR}) ; do
  echo $f
  perl -pi -e "s/sizeof ([*]?[A-Za-z0-9_>\[\]\.-]+)( *)/sizeof\(\1\)\2/g" $f
done


#
#  Delete possible space between "sizeof" and "(".
#

for f in $(grep -rl "sizeof (" ${DIR}) ; do
  perl -pi -e "s/sizeof \(/sizeof\(/g" $f
done

#
#  Delete obnoxious spaces inside parentheses.
#

for f in $(grep -rl "sizeof( " ${DIR}) ; do
  perl -pi -e "s/sizeof\( *([^ \)]+) *\)/sizeof\(\1\)/g" $f
done
===========================================

rday