mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	trivial@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove reference to "depends" directive from Kconfig documentation.
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:14 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612181137300.27491@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061218163522.GE10316@stusta.de>

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:40:25AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   Remove from the documentation the notion of using "depends" rather
> > than "depends on" in Kconfig files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> >   given that there are only three Kconfig files left that still use
> > "depends" rather than "depends on", there's no point encouraging
> > anyone to still use it (although the parser itself still accepts both
> > "depends" and "requires").
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> > index 536d5bf..658abb5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ applicable everywhere (see syntax).
> >    Optionally, dependencies only for this default value can be added with
> >    "if".
> >
> > -- dependencies: "depends on"/"requires" <expr>
> > +- dependencies: "depends on" <expr>
> >    This defines a dependency for this menu entry. If multiple
> >    dependencies are defined, they are connected with '&&'. Dependencies
> >    are applied to all other options within this menu entry (which also
>
> Your patch does something different:
> It's not about "depends", it's about the unused alternative "requires".
>
> Removing "requires" sounds reasonable (even for the implementation, not
> only the documentation), but that's different from what you were
> thinking about.

argh, sorry, brain glitch there.  i'll resubmit with the right
wording.

rday

      reply	other threads:[~2006-12-18 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-18 15:40 Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 16:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-18 16:38   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612181137300.27491@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®