From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754471AbWLRTmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:42:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754473AbWLRTmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:42:54 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([66.45.37.187]:49879 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754471AbWLRTmx (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:42:53 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1294 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:42:53 EST Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:18 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: NFS Filesystem Size Limit? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have a question I could not quickly find on Google/mailing lists-- Say I have some sort of global filesystem or NFS which is 200TB. Is there a limit either: A) In the Linux kernel or B) In the NFS spec That would limit the client as to what it could see via NFS or global filesystem? Or could both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels 'see' the 200TB global filesystem over NFS or global filesystem? Justin.