From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932856AbWLSR4p (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:56:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932861AbWLSR4p (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:56:45 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:56504 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932856AbWLSR4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:56:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:53:22 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Adrian Bunk cc: "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux kernel mailing list , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax In-Reply-To: <20061218180447.GF10316@stusta.de> Message-ID: References: <20061218180447.GF10316@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use > > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files. > >... > > Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also > remove the implementation? Mostly to keep the noise in the generated files low I prefer to just add some warning prints and I'll remove them later with some other syntax changes. This would also give external trees the chance to fix any possible usage first. bye, Roman