From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: macros: "do-while" versus "({ })" and a compile-time error
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:20:31 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701100116420.10133@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701091415200.12545@chaos.analogic.com>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
>
> > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> just to stir the pot a bit regarding the discussion of the two
> >> different ways to define macros,
> >
> > You mean function-like macros, right?
> >
> >> i've just noticed that the "({ })"
> >> notation is not universally acceptable. i've seen examples where
> >> using that notation causes gcc to produce:
> >>
> >> error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function
> >
> > And function calls and macros which expand to "do { expr; } while (0)"
> > won't work anywhere outside of functions either.
> >
> >> i wasn't aware that there were limits on this notation. can someone
> >> clarify this? under what circumstances *can't* you use that notation?
> >> thanks.
> >
> > The limitations are certainly highly compiler-specific.
>
> I don't think so. You certainly couldn't write working 'C' code like
> this:
>
> do { a = 1; } while(0);
>
> This _needs_ to be inside a function. In fact any runtime operations
> need to be inside functions. It's only in assembly that you could
> 'roll your own' code like:
>
> main:
> ret 0
>
>
> Most of these errors come about as a result of changes where a macro
> used to define a constant. Later on, it was no longer a constant in
> code that didn't actually get compiled during the testing.
just FYI, the reason i brought this up in the first place is that i
noticed that the ALIGN() macro in kernel.h didn't verify that the
alignment value was a power of 2, so i thought -- hmmm, i wonder if
there are any invocations where that's not true, so i (temporarily)
rewrote ALIGN to incorporate that check, and the build blew up
including include/net/neighbour.h, which contains the out-of-function
declaration:
struct neighbour
{
...
unsigned char ha[ALIGN(MAX_ADDR_LEN, sizeof(unsigned long))];
...
so it's not a big deal, it was just me goofing around and breaking
things.
rday
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-10 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-08 18:50 Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-09 17:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-09 17:33 ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-09 19:23 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-01-09 20:19 ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-10 6:20 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2007-01-10 12:16 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-01-10 13:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-01-10 14:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-01-10 18:25 ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-10 21:49 ` J.A. Magallón
2007-01-10 22:04 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0701100116420.10133@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®