From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] epoll reduced (to 1) number of passes over the ready set ...
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:14:15 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702262005440.10867@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702261959260.12485@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because
> > of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again,
> > I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this
> > (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an
> > epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way to "ship" events to userspace (in
> > a single pass).
>
> Ok, this looks fine, but I think it makes more sense with (a) a sign-off
> line and perhaps a slightly expanded explanation, and (b) keeping it in
> -mm until after 2.6.21 is out, and merging it then.
>
> Yes? No? Linus is on some crazy drugs again?
Let me do more testing. My post was to have more eyes looking at it. Once
I feel confident about it, and if no objections come from review, I'll
sign and repost.
- Davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-27 2:32 Davide Libenzi
2007-02-27 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-27 4:14 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2007-02-27 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-27 16:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-28 11:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-02-28 15:29 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0702262005440.10867@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com \
--to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®