From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161078AbXCGHNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:13:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161081AbXCGHNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:13:34 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([64.71.152.41]:42426 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161078AbXCGHNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:13:33 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:11:49 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com To: Stephen Rothwell cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] signalfd v1 - signalfd core ... In-Reply-To: <20070307155553.06c82ca1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20070307155553.06c82ca1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: CFAE 5BEE FD36 F65E E640 56FE 0974 BF23 270F 474E X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://www.xmailserver.org/davidel.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:36:56 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > > The read(2) call will read u32 signal numbers that landed over the > > signalfd. It returns the size of the data copied, or zero if the sighand > > we are attached to, has been detached. > > So what about signals that the user asked for a siginfo_t to be returned > with? O-Ren: "You didn't think it was gonna be that easy, did you?" B-Kiddo: "You know, for a second there, yeah, I kinda did." :) I could do that, since where I placed the signalfd_notify() I have the siginfo. But that is going to make code a little more complex, since the simple bitmaks needs to become a queue. - Davide