From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767381AbXCIQlF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:41:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767384AbXCIQlF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:41:05 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:59355 "EHLO netops-testserver-3.corp.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767381AbXCIQlE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:41:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:40:58 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Mel Gorman cc: akpm@osdl.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , mpm@selenic.com, Manfred Spraul Subject: Re: [SLUB 0/3] SLUB: The unqueued slab allocator V4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070307023502.19658.39217.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20070308174004.GB12958@skynet.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by per-order queues. The buddy allocator already > has per-order lists. Somehow they do not seem to work right. SLAB (and now SLUB too) can avoid (or defer) fragmentation by keeping its own queues.