From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932507AbXCUPp1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932489AbXCUPp0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:45:26 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:36270 "EHLO graphe.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932414AbXCUPp0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:45:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Eric Dumazet cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux kernel Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] SLAB : [NUMA] keep nodeid in struct page instead of struct slab In-Reply-To: <20070321163635.82697f08.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Message-ID: References: <20070321102231.7288f231.dada1@cosmosbay.com> <20070321163635.82697f08.dada1@cosmosbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:41:46 -0700 (PDT) > Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > In order to avoid a cache miss in kmem_cache_free() on NUMA and reduce hot path length, we could exploit the following common facts. > > > > > > 1) MAX_NUMNODES <= 64 > > > > MAX_NUMNODES == 1024 on IA64 and may be on x86_64 in the future. > > So what ? I am very happy for you Christoph. You wanted to exploit that MAX_NUMNODES <= 64?