mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID (non-preempt) server blocking question. (2.6.20.4)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:11:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703290410260.32099@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17931.23488.160031.119117@notabene.brown>



On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:

> On Tuesday March 27, jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com wrote:
>> I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning.  However, when I did so,
>> I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files.  After I executed the check,
>> the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do 'nothing' in the
>> process until the check finished.  Is this normal?  Should a check block
>> all I/O to the device and put the processes writing to a particular device
>> in 'D' state until it is finished?
>
> No, that shouldn't happen.  The 'check' should notice any other disk
> activity and slow down if anything else is happening on the device.
>
> Did the check run to completion?  And if so, did the 'lftp' start
> working normally again?
Yes it did and the lftp did start working normally again.

>
> Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
> running at?
Around 44MB/s.

I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other 
processes to 'stay alive'?

echo "Setting minimum resync speed to 200MB/s..."
echo "This improves the resync speed from 2.1MB/s to 44MB/s"
echo 200000 > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_speed_min
echo 200000 > /sys/block/md1/md/sync_speed_min
echo 200000 > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_speed_min
echo 200000 > /sys/block/md3/md/sync_speed_min
echo 200000 > /sys/block/md4/md/sync_speed_min



>
> NeilBrown
>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-29  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-27  9:59 Justin Piszcz
2007-03-29  6:25 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-29  8:11   ` Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-03-29  8:56     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-03-29  9:00       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-03-30  4:38     ` Neil Brown
2007-03-30  8:12       ` Justin Piszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703290410260.32099@p34.internal.lan \
    --to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®