From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966002AbXDBWu4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:50:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966052AbXDBWuK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:50:10 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:36576 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966035AbXDBWt6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:49:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:49:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Martin Bligh cc: Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Switch to SPARSE_VIRTUAL In-Reply-To: <461186A7.2020803@google.com> Message-ID: References: <20070401071024.23757.4113.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <1175550968.22373.122.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200704030031.24898.ak@suse.de> <461186A7.2020803@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Martin Bligh wrote: > > For 64GB you'd need 256M which would be a quarter of low mem. Probably takes > > up too much of low mem. > > Yup. We could move whatever you currently use to handle that into i386 arch code. Or are there other platforms that do similar tricks with highmem? We already have special hooks for node lookups in sparsemem. Move all of that off into some arch dir?