From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932184AbXDEAaj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:30:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932334AbXDEAaj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:30:39 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:35685 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbXDEAai (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:30:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:30:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml , William Lee Irwin III , Zachary Amsden , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing In-Reply-To: <20070404191205.392155702@goop.org> Message-ID: References: <20070404191151.009821039@goop.org> <20070404191205.392155702@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Christoph Lameter for all thats worth since I am not a i386 specialist. How much of the issues with page struct sharing between slab and arch code does this address?