mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:09:33 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704241339460.26223@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070423154224.15ebf8f7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> OK.  I hope.  the mapping_gfp_mask() here will have come from bdget()'s
> mapping_set_gfp_mask(&inode->i_data, GFP_USER);  If anyone is accidentally
> setting __GFP_HIGHMEM on a blockdev address_space we'll cause ghastly
> explosions.  Albeit ones which were well-deserved.

I've not yet looked at the patch under discussion, but this remark
prompts me...  a couple of days ago I got very worried by the various
hard-wired GFP_HIGHUSER allocations in mm/migrate.c and mm/mempolicy.c,
and wondered how those would work out if someone has a blockdev mmap'ed.

I tried to test it out before sending a patch, but found no problem at
all: maybe I was too timid (fearing to corrupt my whole system), maybe 
I've forgotten how that stuff works and wasn't doing the right thing
to reproduce it (I was mmap'ing /dev/sdb1 readonly, at the same time
as having it mounted as ext2 - when I forced migration to random pages,
then cp'ed /dev/zero to reuse the old pages, I was expecting ext2 to
get very upset with its metadata; mmap'ing while mounted isn't very
realistic, but my earlier sequence hadn't shown any problem either,
so I thought the cache got invalidated in between).

Here's the patch I'd suggest adding if you believe there really is
a problem there: it's far from ideal (I can imagine mapping_gfp_mask
being used to enforce other restrictions, but the __GFP_HIGHMEM issue
seems to be the only one in practice; and it would be a shame to
restrict all the architectures which have no concept of HIGHMEM).
If there's no such problem, sorry for wasting your time.

(If vma->vm_file is non-NULL, we can be sure vma->vm_file->f_mapping
is non-NULL, can't we?  Some common code assumes that, some does not:
I've avoided cargo-cult safety below, but don't let me make it unsafe.)


Is there a problem with page migration to HIGHMEM, if pages were
mapped from a GFP_USER block device?  I failed to demonstrate any
problem, but here's a quick fix if needed.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>

--- 2.6.21-rc7/include/linux/migrate.h	2007-03-07 13:08:59.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/include/linux/migrate.h	2007-04-24 13:18:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #define _LINUX_MIGRATE_H
 
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/pagemap.h>
 
 typedef struct page *new_page_t(struct page *, unsigned long private, int **);
 
@@ -10,6 +11,13 @@ static inline int vma_migratable(struct 
 {
 	if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO|VM_HUGETLB|VM_PFNMAP|VM_RESERVED))
 		return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+	if (vma->vm_file) {
+		struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
+		if (!(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & __GFP_HIGHMEM))
+			return 0;
+	}
+#endif
 	return 1;
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-24 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-23 21:11 Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 21:37   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:33   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 13:09       ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2007-04-24 17:11         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:06           ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:55             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:16               ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 20:30                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:42                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:44                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:53                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:58                         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 21:24                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 21:28                             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:38         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45           ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 17:48             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:51             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 17:56               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 18:53           ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:34             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 19:49               ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:59                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:10                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:12                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:20                       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704241339460.26223@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®