From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1161691AbXEDSrq@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161691AbXEDSrq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 4 May 2007 14:47:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161625AbXEDSrp
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 4 May 2007 14:47:45 -0400
Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:48911 "EHLO
	relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1161605AbXEDSrm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 4 May 2007 14:47:42 -0400
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
       Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
       James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
       Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
In-Reply-To: <463B7F63.8070508@cs.helsinki.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705041147000.24625@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
References: <20070504102651.923946304@chello.nl>  <20070504103157.215424767@chello.nl>
  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705040932200.22033@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> 
 <1178301545.24217.56.camel@twins>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705041104110.23539@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
  <1178302904.2767.6.camel@lappy>  <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705041128270.24283@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <1178303538.2767.9.camel@lappy> <463B7F63.8070508@cs.helsinki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 4 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Again, slab has no way of actually estimating how many pages you need for a
> given number of objects. So we end up calculating some upper bound which
> doesn't belong in mm/slab.c. I am perfectly okay with:

It can give a worst case number and that is what he wants.