From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S971519AbXEIAna (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 20:43:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S971354AbXEIAnH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 20:43:07 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:48274 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S971457AbXEIAnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 20:43:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:43:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Matt Mackall cc: Alan Cox , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + fix-spellings-of-slab-allocator-section-in-init-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree In-Reply-To: <20070509003323.GX11115@waste.org> Message-ID: References: <200705082302.l48N2KrZ004229@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070509002307.GV11115@waste.org> <20070509013220.02093f2e@the-village.bc.nu> <20070509003323.GX11115@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 May 2007, Matt Mackall wrote: > Further, the received wisdom that fragmentation of SLAB-like systems > is better is not above doubt. Our own issues with dcache fragmentation > suggest it's far from perfect. I guess that you have not seen the slab defrag code for SLUB then.