From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934726AbXEMQti (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 12:49:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759296AbXEMQta (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 12:49:30 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([64.71.152.41]:2564 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759287AbXEMQt3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 12:49:29 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: undefined reference to `__clear_user' (was: Re: [patch 2/13] signal/timer/event fds v10 - signalfd core ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: CFAE 5BEE FD36 F65E E640 56FE 0974 BF23 270F 474E X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://www.xmailserver.org/davidel.asc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 13 May 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I only noticed because m68k doesn't have __clear_user(), as this routine > was never needed by generic code before your change. As I told to Al, I could use clear_user in there, but IMO it'd be better to align m68k to the standard Linux user access rule (double-underscore and not double-underscore version). - Davide