Re: [PATCH] Add ip6_tunnel.h to headers_install

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>]

On Sat, 19 May 2007, Deepak Saxena wrote:

>
> The Mobile IPv6 package (http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/software/) needs
> this header file to build the tunnelctl component. The header
> already looks sanitized so is safe to export.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@mvista.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/Kbuild b/include/linux/Kbuild
> index bcd01f2..e101315 100644
> --- a/include/linux/Kbuild
> +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ unifdef-y += ipc.h
>  unifdef-y += ipmi.h
>  unifdef-y += ipv6.h
>  unifdef-y += ipv6_route.h
> +unifdef-y += ip6_tunnel.h
>  unifdef-y += isdn.h
>  unifdef-y += isdnif.h
>  unifdef-y += isdn_divertif.h

  is there some understood standard for naming header files related to
IPv6?  currently, there are header files that start with any one of
"ip6_", "ipv6_" and "ip6t_" (although the latter looks like it's
specifically for netfilter stuff).

  is there meant to be a distinction between prefixes of "ipv6_" and
"ip6_"?

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================