From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Srihari Vijayaraghavan <sriharivijayaraghavan@yahoo.com.au>,
Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] 2.6.22-rc2 panics on x86-64 with slub
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:44:50 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705211930370.31659@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705211121570.26794@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > Yes, sounded the same to me too: I couldn't reproduce it or see anything
> > wrong in the code back then. But Srihari's info about CONFIG_DEBUG_SLUB
> > off has helped a lot: I was then able to reproduce it on my x86_64, and
> > after a lot of staring at the code, the problem became obvious...
>
> Right. The #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is at the wrong location. The best fix
> is to moving the #ifdef otherwise the size is still wrong for the
> ctor case.
? My patch did handle the ctor case.
>
> SLUB Debug: Fix object size calculation
>
> The object size calculation is wrong if !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG because
> the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is now switching off the size adjustments
> for DESTROY_BY_RCU and ctor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Yes, I think that should do it too. The reason behind my repeating
the block was to handle the case where SLAB_POISON is passed to
kmem_cache_create, but CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is off. But apparently
that case would hit the BUG_ON(flags & ~CREATE_MASK), therefore
your patch is simpler and better. Quite a maze.
Hugh
>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: slub/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- slub.orig/mm/slub.c 2007-05-21 11:21:36.000000000 -0700
> +++ slub/mm/slub.c 2007-05-21 11:21:49.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1943,7 +1943,6 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_c
> */
> s->inuse = size;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> if (((flags & (SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU | SLAB_POISON)) ||
> s->ctor)) {
> /*
> @@ -1958,6 +1957,7 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_c
> size += sizeof(void *);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> if (flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
> /*
> * Need to store information about allocs and frees after
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-20 13:35 Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-21 16:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 17:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-21 18:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 18:44 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2007-05-21 18:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-21 19:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-21 19:09 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-21 19:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-21 19:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-21 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 22:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 23:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-22 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-22 8:26 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-22 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-22 11:01 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-22 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-22 11:26 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-22 13:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-22 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-22 18:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-22 20:10 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-22 22:15 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-22 22:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-23 7:11 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-23 17:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-24 7:25 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-24 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-25 6:12 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-25 13:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-25 14:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-26 1:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-26 2:49 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-23 10:18 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-23 17:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-23 17:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-23 22:23 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-23 22:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-24 13:12 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-24 16:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-24 21:30 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-24 22:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-24 22:39 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-21 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-20 3:09 Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-20 7:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-20 7:40 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2007-05-20 13:24 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 13:37 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705211930370.31659@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=sriharivijayaraghavan@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®