mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING?
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:38:09 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705240836340.4500@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada7iqz9qlj.fsf@cisco.com>

On Wed, 23 May 2007, Roland Dreier wrote:

>  > - every static function in a header file must be __always_inline
>
> Why?  Why does it matter whether a function is defined in a .h file or
> a .c file?  Can't the compiler decide better than we can whether
> something should be inlined or not?
>
> Your argument seems to imply that we should never use the inline
> keyword at all.

i hate to be in the middle of one of these again, but i think i
initiated this topic way back when when i (like rob landley) asked why
that config option was still around when it's been listed for deletion
for a year.

regardless of its good or bad points, one way or the other, something
should be updated.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-24 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-23 19:10 Rob Landley
2007-05-23 19:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-23 21:22   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-23 21:28     ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-24 12:38       ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2007-05-24 16:55         ` Rob Landley
2007-05-24 17:10       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-24 17:14         ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-24 17:47           ` Rob Landley
2007-05-24 17:47             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-24 18:14               ` Rob Landley
2007-05-24 17:55             ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-24 18:07               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-24 18:32                 ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-24 22:41                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-24 17:57           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-23 21:31     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-24 17:12       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-24 16:29     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-24 17:14       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-24 17:17         ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-24 17:40       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705240836340.4500@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®