From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately?
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:14:54 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706011410130.3716@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
Dear Customer,
Thank you for contacting Intel(R) Technical Support.
After reviewing the email history on this case, we have the following suggestions/comments:
Note before continuing: Debian* Linux Operating System is not an officially, validated, tested Operating System for the Intel(R) Desktop Board DG965WH (see http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Product_Filter.aspx?ProductID=2375); moreover, we do confirm that "on a system that has 8 GB of system memory installed, it is not possible to use all of the installed memory due to system address space being allocated for other system critical functions." [qtd. on page 43 of the Technical Product Specification (see http://download.intel.com/design/motherbd/wh/D5600801US.pdf)]. Thus, the following suggestions are provided AS IS; we cannot guarantee the problem would be fixed afterwards:
1. Try updating the BIOS to the most current version (1687):
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/filter_results.aspx?strTypes=all&ProductID=2375&OSFullName=OS+Independent&lang=eng&strOSs=38&submit=Go%21
Note: Once the update is done, please, restart the system and repeat the following:
Press <F9> to restore BIOS default settings. Reset any customized BIOS settings. Clear all DMI event logs, which are located in the Advanced/Event Log Configuration section of the BIOS Setup utility. Press <F10> to save the new settings and reboot the system.
2. If the problem continues, please, ensure the brand and part# of the memory modules are listed among the tested memory lists (see http://developer.intel.com/design/motherbd/wh/wh_mem.htm#1).
------------
Before I upgraded to 8GB, I used to upgrade my BIOS everytime a new
version came out, however, once I upgraded past 1666P I also noticed this
problem even with 4GB of memory, I tried to downgrade back to 1666P and it
corrupted the BIOS/failed and I had to wait 1-2 weeks for the RMA process,
1 week to get there, 1-3 days for analysis etc, they do ship two-day
shipping back to you however..
Per Robert's response, this is the fix I will be using as Intel wants me
to upgrade the BIOS to the defaults, which could potentially cause another
motherboard failure. I'll stick with the mem= option. I need to read up
on the E820 memory map.
How come the kernel does not automatically map the memory correctly and
then put a message in syslog/dmesg: Only using 7.7GB because your BIOS is
using 64MB for other purposes, re-mapping kernel into higher memory..
Any comments?
Per Robert below:
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> That output looked nasty, attaching entries from syslog.
>
> Justin.
Here's your E820 memory map, from dmesg:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000008f000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000000008f000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cf58f000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf58f000 - 00000000cf59c000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf59c000 - 00000000cf653000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf653000 - 00000000cf6a5000 (ACPI NVS)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6a5000 - 00000000cf6a8000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6a8000 - 00000000cf6ef000 (ACPI NVS)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6ef000 - 00000000cf6f1000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6f1000 - 00000000cf6f2000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6f2000 - 00000000cf6ff000 (ACPI data)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf6ff000 - 00000000cf700000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000cf700000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fff00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 000000022c000000 (usable)
so the usable memory ranges are:
0-572K
1MB-3317.55MB
3317.60MB-3317.75MB
3318.94MB-3318.945MB
3318.996MB-3319MB
4096MB-8896MB
and the MTRRs (from /proc/mtrr, from private email):
reg00: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
reg01: base=0x80000000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1
reg02: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
reg03: base=0xcf800000 (3320MB), size= 8MB: uncachable, count=1
reg04: base=0xcf700000 (3319MB), size= 1MB: uncachable, count=1
reg05: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1
reg06: base=0x200000000 (8192MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
reg07: base=0x220000000 (8704MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1
so the ranges mapped as cacheable are:
0-3319MB
4096-8832MB
leaving 64MB of memory at the top of RAM uncached. What do you want to
bet that something important (kernel code?) is getting loaded there..
So essentially it's a BIOS problem, it's not setting up the MTRRs
properly in order to map all of RAM as cacheable. As Andi says, complain
to Intel.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-01 18:14 Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-06-01 19:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-01 19:17 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 19:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 19:21 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-01 21:14 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 20:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 20:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 20:26 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-01 21:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-01 21:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 21:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-01 21:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-02 1:05 ` Venki Pallipadi
2007-06-02 1:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-02 8:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-02 9:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-02 20:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-03 9:15 ` Matt Keenan
2007-06-04 15:40 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-04 15:48 ` Ray Lee
2007-06-04 15:49 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-04 16:01 ` Ray Lee
2007-06-04 15:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-04 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 18:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-04 18:22 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-04 19:08 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-04 19:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-04 19:18 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-04 21:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-05 0:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-06-05 1:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-05 9:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 13:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-06-05 17:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-06-07 8:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 19:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 19:24 ` Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately? II Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 0:54 ` Intel's response Linux/MTRR/8GB Memory Support / Why doesn't the kernel realize the BIOS has problems and re-map appropriately? Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706011410130.3716@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®