From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763977AbXFBWzy (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762470AbXFBWzq (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:46 -0400 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:53036 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761812AbXFBWzq (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:46 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:55:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? In-Reply-To: <4661F511.4070207@goop.org> Message-ID: References: <4661F511.4070207@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in >> development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch >> by ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have >> any severe XFS issues? > > XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended > by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this > corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is in > 2.6.22-rc3-mm1, but it hasn't been merged upstream yet. > > J > > Ah that's it- and USB appears to be broken as well, I'll stick with 2.6.21.3 for now. Thanks! Justin.