From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@rfo.atmel.com>,
ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc-atmel : fix kunmap wrong usage
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:00:23 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221237330.26363@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706220828.18750.marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Marc Pignat wrote:
> from: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
>
> kunmap must be called on the pointer returned by kmap.
Not necessarily: an offset within the same page is acceptable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
>
> ---
>
> N.B: This is the same patch as yesterday, with proper Signed-off-by and more
> comments.
>
> The buffer variable is used this way:
> buffer = kmap_atomic(sg->page, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ) + sg->offset;
> So we can't do
> kunmap_atomic(buffer, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
> we must do
> kunmap_atomic(buffer - sg->offset, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
>
> Strangely this misuse showed no problem using CONFIG_SLAB, but oops using
> CONFIG_SLUB, (lkml ''Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator").
Aren't you just guessing there? Those kunmap_atomics in at91_mci.c
may look wrong to you, but they're not incorrect (so long as sg->offset
falls within the page, as it must do here to make sense of the page).
Especially not on ARM, where kunmap_atomic actually has no interest
in the argument passed. And the oops was in the flush_dcache_page.
If you actually reproduced Nicolas' problem on ARM, and verified
that your patch then fixes it, please let us know: that will be
remarkably interesting.
I believe I posted the correct fix last night (or at least a safe fix
for now: Christoph Lameter may prefer to undo it and change ARM's
dma_mapping at leisure later), checking PageSlab in page_mapping;
and Linus has already put that one into his git tree.
But it would be good to hear from Nicolas whether that indeed fixes
his oops: I couldn't actually try my patch on ARM either.
Hugh
>
> Regards
>
> Marc
>
> --- drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c-2.6.22-rc5.orig 2007-06-21 16:27:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c-2.6.22-rc5 2007-06-21 16:42:48.000000000 +0200
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static inline void at91mci_sg_to_dma(str
> else
> memcpy(dmabuf, sgbuffer, amount);
>
> - kunmap_atomic(sgbuffer, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
> + kunmap_atomic(sgbuffer - sg->offset, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
>
> if (size == 0)
> break;
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void at91mci_post_dma_read(struct
> buffer[index] = swab32(buffer[index]);
> }
>
> - kunmap_atomic(buffer, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
> + kunmap_atomic(buffer - sg->offset, KM_BIO_SRC_IRQ);
> flush_dcache_page(sg->page);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 9:30 Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-21 14:54 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-21 14:57 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-21 15:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-22 6:28 ` [PATCH] mmc-atmel : fix kunmap wrong usage Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 12:00 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2007-06-22 13:34 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-22 13:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 14:21 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 14:58 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-22 9:09 ` Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-21 22:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 7:00 ` Russell King
2007-06-22 1:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 5:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-22 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 17:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 18:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 19:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 19:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 22:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-23 10:40 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-24 8:38 ` Russell King
2007-06-24 10:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-24 10:51 ` Russell King
2007-06-25 0:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 13:55 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-25 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 16:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 17:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-26 18:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:18 ` Russell King
2007-06-22 1:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:31 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0706221237330.26363@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=andrew@sanpeople.com \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@rfo.atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®