From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759310AbXFZSXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:23:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757614AbXFZSXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:23:31 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:44831 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752379AbXFZSXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:23:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:23:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 21/26] Slab defragmentation: support dentry defragmentation In-Reply-To: <20070626011845.bfd4efe0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070618095838.238615343@sgi.com> <20070618095918.404020641@sgi.com> <20070626011845.bfd4efe0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > + * objects. > > + */ > > + abort = 1; > > It's unobvious why the entire shrink effort is abandoned if one busy dentry > is encountered. Please flesh the comment out explaining this. If one item is busy then we cannot reclaim the slab. So what would be the use of continuing efforts. I thought I put that into the description? I can put that into the code too.