From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
eng.linux@digi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Remove support for the orphaned, obsolete Digi EPCA driver.
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:48:35 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707020945290.18113@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070702144605.5cf99b3a@the-village.bc.nu>
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > everything indicates that this driver is thoroughly dead. the
> > MAINTAINERS file describes it as "Orphaned", while the file
> > Documentation/digiepca.txt reads:
>
> NAK
>
> > "NOTE: This driver is obsolete. Digi provides a 2.6 driver (dgdm) at
> > http://www.digi.com for PCI cards. They no longer maintain this driver,
> > and have no 2.6 driver for ISA cards.
>
> This driver is obsolete from the kernel at the point the new digi drivers
> are merged.
>
> > This driver requires a number of user-space tools. They can be acquired from
> > http://www.digi.com, but only works with 2.4 kernels."
>
> So fix them or merge the newer digi drivers first.
ok, but what then does it mean to read that this driver:
1) *requires* a number of user-space tools, and
2) these tools don't work with the 2.6 kernel?
how then does this driver have any value under 2.6 if it requires
user-space support that doesn't exist for 2.6?
obviously, i'll withdraw the patch, but it's still a mystery to me how
that driver can have any value under a 2.6 kernel, just based on
what's written above.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-02 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-02 13:14 Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-02 13:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-02 13:48 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2007-07-02 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-02 14:20 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-02 14:56 ` Kilau, Scott
2007-07-02 15:05 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0707020945290.18113@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=eng.linux@digi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®