From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759401AbXGCKf0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:35:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756969AbXGCKfR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:35:17 -0400 Received: from nic.NetDirect.CA ([216.16.235.2]:40291 "EHLO rubicon.netdirect.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756504AbXGCKfP (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:35:15 -0400 X-Originating-Ip: 72.143.66.27 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 06:32:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-16.8, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -15.00, INIT_RECVD_OUR_AUTH -20.00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 20.00) X-Net-Direct-Inc-MailScanner-From: rpjday@mindspring.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM wasn't selected by default for x86. given what i thought was fairly widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as part of the default config? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ========================================================================