From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761147AbXGJTnr (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:43:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756641AbXGJTnk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:43:40 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:37184 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755289AbXGJTnj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:43:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:43:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Adrian Bunk cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] slub.c:early_kmem_cache_node_alloc() shouldn't be __init In-Reply-To: <20070710190123.GB3492@stusta.de> Message-ID: References: <20070710124445.GX3492@stusta.de> <20070710190123.GB3492@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > But I'm not convinced it's really worth manually forcing noinline only > for moving a few bytes to __init in the CONFIG_NUMA=y case - in the > long term this will only bit rot. Allright then Acked-by: Christoph Lameter