From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: recheck lock rlim after f_op->mmap() method
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:27:05 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101813390.4717@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070709184917.GA8720@dnb.sw.ru>
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Some device drivers can change vm_flags in their f_op->mmap
> method. In order to be on the safe side we have to recheck
> lock rlimit. Now we have to check lock rlimit from two places,
> let's move this common code to helper functon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Or would this simpler patch be the right one? I suspect the
mspec driver only says VM_LOCKED because of a deep-seated but
irrational fear that its pages might fall into reclaim.
(I'd like to take out VM_RESERVED too, but that can always happen
another, indefinitely postponed time; there are others of those.)
Hugh
--- 2.6.22/drivers/char/mspec.c 2007-04-26 04:08:32.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/char/mspec.c 2007-07-10 18:12:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ mspec_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_
vdata->refcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
vma->vm_private_data = vdata;
- vma->vm_flags |= (VM_IO | VM_LOCKED | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP);
+ vma->vm_flags |= (VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP);
if (vdata->type == MSPEC_FETCHOP || vdata->type == MSPEC_UNCACHED)
vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
vma->vm_ops = &mspec_vm_ops;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-09 18:49 Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-10 17:27 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2007-07-10 17:53 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-10 19:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-11 8:39 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-07-11 18:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-11 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 10:12 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-11 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-13 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 8:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-13 13:02 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101813390.4717@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@sw.ru \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®