From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762632AbXGPObx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:31:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757064AbXGPObr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:31:47 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:1899 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756823AbXGPObq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:31:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:32:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Ingo Molnar cc: Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers In-Reply-To: <20070716140904.GA15028@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <19044.1184539364@lwn.net> <20070716114734.GA12010@elte.hu> <20070716115744.GA14131@elte.hu> <20070716121906.GA18169@elte.hu> <20070716140904.GA15028@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > because when i assumed the obvious, you called it an > insult so please dont leave any room for assumptions and remove any > ambiguity - especially as our communication seems to be marred by what > appears to be frequent misunderstandings ;-) What the hell is this supposed to be? How am I not to take this: "i did not want to embarrass you (and distract the discussion) with answering a pretty stupid, irrelevant question" as an insult? How does it reflect on someone if he asks "stupid, irrelevant questions"? If it had been a misunderstanding, you could have ask appropriately instead of assuming I'm an idiot. BTW Adding smileys to it doesn't make it any funnier, since it I don't believe in the "misunderstandings" theory anymore. :-( bye, Roman