From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765360AbXHARwg (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:52:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754471AbXHARwZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:52:25 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:43020 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760635AbXHARwY (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:52:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:52:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Andi Kleen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Simple Performance Counters: x86_64 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <11859243121617-git-send-email-clameter@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > Christoph Lameter writes: > > > Export cycles_to_ns (after renaming the cycles_2_ns to cycles_to_ns to be > > conforming to other arches). > > This function is broken in some cases (e.g Opteron with powernow or > AMD dual core or older Intel systems) and going away. The TSCs tick > with different frequencies on different CPU there. In general i would > recommend to only report cycles. But then the numbers are not comparable across systems.