From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: building a specific in-tree module is currently a bit broken
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 06:23:05 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709050621160.2509@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709051202200.5419@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Sep 5 2007 05:42, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >that doesn't solve the problem. i should have mentioned that i
> >already (unnecessarily, i suggest) ran "make modules_prepare", but
> >the problem persists.
> >
> >the issue seems to be that running that last make command to build
> >the module visor.ko doesn't somehow signal the Makefile that this
> >is a *module* build, and therefore no module-related initialization
> >is done, such as creating that directory or setting the Makefile
> >variable MODVERDIR, etc, etc.
>
> ah... make M=drivers/foo/bar/
> it builds the whole directory, but at least it builds it.
oh, i know *that* works but, as you can see, that make command has
enough info (the "M=" variable) to kick the Makefile into
module-building mode, so things work properly.
the original problem, of course, is still there. but i think i've
flogged this sufficiently. i'll leave someone else to do the fixing.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-05 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-05 9:16 Robert P. J. Day
2007-09-05 9:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-09-05 9:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-05 9:42 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-09-05 10:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-05 10:23 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2007-09-05 20:11 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-05 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0709050621160.2509@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®