From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764417AbXKTU65 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:58:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762950AbXKTU6j (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:58:39 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:57147 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762864AbXKTU6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:58:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:58:34 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Andi Kleen cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, travis@sgi.com, Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rfc 08/45] cpu alloc: x86 support In-Reply-To: <200711202151.58310.ak@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20071120011132.143632442@sgi.com> <200711201301.25373.ak@suse.de> <474346DE.5050305@zytor.com> <200711202151.58310.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > This limitation shouldn't apply to the percpu area, since gs_base can be > > pointed anywhere in the address space -- in effect we're always indirect. > > The initial reference copy of the percpu area has to be addressed by > the linker. Right that is important for the percpu references that can be folded by the linker in order to avoid address calculations. > Hmm, in theory since it is not actually used by itself I suppose you could > move it into positive space. But the positive space is reserved for a processes memory.