From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: apiszcz@solarrain.com
Subject: Kernel 2.6.23.9 + mdadm 2.6.2-2 + Auto rebuild RAID1?
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:19:14 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712010614070.25643@p34.internal.lan> (raw)
Quick question,
Setup a new machine last night with two raptor 150 disks. Setup RAID1 as
I do everywhere else, 0.90.03 superblocks (in order to be compatible with
LILO, if you use 1.x superblocks with LILO you can't boot), and then:
/dev/sda1+sdb1 <-> /dev/md0 <-> swap
/dev/sda2+sdb2 <-> /dev/md1 <-> /boot (ext3)
/dev/sda3+sdb3 <-> /dev/md2 <-> / (xfs)
All works fine, no issues...
Quick question though, I turned off the machine, disconnected /dev/sda
from the machine, boot from /dev/sdb, no problems, shows as degraded
RAID1. Turn the machine off. Re-attach the first drive. When I boot my
first partition either re-synced by itself or it was not degraded, was is
this?
So two questions:
1) If it rebuilt by itself, how come it only rebuilt /dev/md0?
2) If it did not rebuild, is it because the kernel knows it does not need
to re-calculate parity etc for swap?
I had to:
mdadm /dev/md1 -a /dev/sda2
and
mdadm /dev/md2 -a /dev/sda3
To rebuild the /boot and /, which worked fine, I am just curious though
why it works like this, I figured it would be all or nothing.
More info:
Not using ANY initramfs/initrd images, everything is compiled into 1
kernel image (makes things MUCH simpler and the expected device layout etc
is always the same, unlike initrd/etc).
Justin.
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-01 11:19 Justin Piszcz [this message]
2007-12-01 12:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-01 12:12 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-01 12:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-01 12:22 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-05 19:29 ` Nix
2007-12-06 15:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-07 7:30 ` Nix
2007-12-07 8:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0712010614070.25643@p34.internal.lan \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=apiszcz@solarrain.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®