From: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@gmail.com>
To: devzero@web.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt.Domsch@dell.com, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:34:33 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712161127180.4465@mini.warudkars.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49015158@web.de>
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, devzero@web.de wrote:
>
> - it seems there are buggy Bios implementations out there which have problems with EDD
> - your favourite distro may have set CONFIG_EDD=y|m , so EDD probe is on by default quite often nowadays.
> - setting "edd=off" when you get that hang on boot is _not_ obvious.
It does not look like this issue is common - googling for "Linux EDD Boot
hang" does not bring up relevant and recent results - in fact this post of
yours comes on top. Further more there does not seem to be problems with
newer BIOSes so we would be irritating lot many users needlessly.
Adding 3 printks for each such obscure problem would make it even more
complex to parse and make sense of the boot log - I, for example, already
dislike the mostly-useless-to-end-user stuff it spews on a normal boot.
If there are known chipsets / BIOSes that have this problem - applying
quirks - something like this quirk for pmtmr [1]- (if they work this
early) or even special casing them with forced edd=off may be the right and more useful thing to do.
[1] http://www.webservertalk.com/archive242-2006-3-1447442.html
Parag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-16 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-16 15:34 devzero
2007-12-16 17:34 ` Parag Warudkar [this message]
2007-12-16 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-22 1:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-22 1:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-22 1:57 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-22 2:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-22 2:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-16 19:11 devzero
2007-12-16 19:59 ` Parag Warudkar
2007-12-16 20:18 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-17 23:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-17 23:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-18 0:10 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-18 0:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-16 19:19 devzero
2007-12-16 21:04 devzero
2007-12-16 21:01 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0712161127180.4465@mini.warudkars.net \
--to=parag.warudkar@gmail.com \
--cc=Matt.Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=devzero@web.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®