From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xip: fix get_zeroed_page with __GFP_HIGHMEM
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:47:53 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712260316140.6684@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071225132126.GA4800@APFDCB5C>
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The use of get_zeroed_page() with __GFP_HIGHMEM is invalid.
> Use alloc_page() with __GFP_ZERO instead of invalid get_zeroed_page().
>
> (This patch is only compile tested)
>
> Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Good find! You got me very worried, how this escaped testing before.
Presumed explanation: it hasn't been needed beyond s390, which has no
CONFIG_HIGHMEM; and it has never been tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM on.
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
But I haven't tested it either: let's wait for Carsten to report.
I believe Nick has changes on the way which will make it possible for
ordinary mortals to test XIP: here's a good argument to bring them on.
May I cross-reference my "prep_zero_page: remove bogus BUG_ON"
09f345da758fca1222b0971b65b2fddbdf78bb83 in 2.6.24-rc: that bogus
(actually VM_)BUG_ON would have stood in the way too, so there's
no point in backporting this without that. But if only non-HIGHMEM
architectures can have been using XIP, a backport is not essential.
Hugh
p.s. Nick's ZERO_PAGE changes, in 2.6.24-rc, actually cancel the need
for a special xip_sparse_page distinct from ZERO_PAGE. But let's not
become dependent on those: keep this doing it the way it does now.
>
> ---
> mm/filemap_xip.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: 2.6-git/mm/filemap_xip.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6-git.orig/mm/filemap_xip.c
> +++ 2.6-git/mm/filemap_xip.c
> @@ -25,14 +25,15 @@ static struct page *__xip_sparse_page;
> static struct page *xip_sparse_page(void)
> {
> if (!__xip_sparse_page) {
> - unsigned long zeroes = get_zeroed_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> - if (zeroes) {
> + struct page *page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO);
> +
> + if (page) {
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xip_alloc_lock);
> spin_lock(&xip_alloc_lock);
> if (!__xip_sparse_page)
> - __xip_sparse_page = virt_to_page(zeroes);
> + __xip_sparse_page = page;
> else
> - free_page(zeroes);
> + __free_page(page);
> spin_unlock(&xip_alloc_lock);
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-26 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-25 13:21 Akinobu Mita
2007-12-26 3:47 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2008-01-07 8:59 ` Carsten Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0712260316140.6684@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®