From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756881AbYBQKhP (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:37:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754896AbYBQKhB (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:37:01 -0500 Received: from wilson.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.42]:60140 "EHLO wilson.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754861AbYBQKhA (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:37:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:36:57 +0100 (CET) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Sam Ravnborg cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Frame Buffer Device Development , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: linux-fbdev is moderated In-Reply-To: <20080217095443.GA9842@uranus.ravnborg.org> Message-ID: References: <20080217095443.GA9842@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:50:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > While linux-fbdev is subscribers-only, non-subscribers are not plainly > > rejected, but moderated, so the casual patch/comment/question comes through. > > Have you considered moving this list to vger.kernel.org? > Almost no spam so the moderation is not needed. Sounds like a good idea to me... Anyone who disagrees? BTW, is there an easy way to tell people the address has changed? I.e. unsubscribing everybody from the sf.net list and letting the sf.net list send customized messages back to posters? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds