From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761474AbYB1Whq (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:37:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754021AbYB1Whh (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:37:37 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:34301 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753329AbYB1Whg (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:37:36 -0500 X-Authenticated: #20450766 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+4s9AV5U2444bLx73zSDQ5qt8jIzL56TUcfeNU/t yJntAiZ7dNU+3U Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:37:36 +0100 (CET) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Unknown SATA PIIX PCI device ID 0x29b6 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi just found out that the eSATA connector on my Intel DQ35JO motherboard doesn't work... because it is connected to the controller with product ID 29b6... And this ID is not yet handled by the driver. Can I have a patch, please?:-) I think the correct entry would be { 0x8086, 0x29b6, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, ich8_2port_sata }, just because it also has two ports. Am I right? I would rather not test blindly. BTW, why are these 2920, 2926, and 29b6 IDs not handled by the ahci driver? The board-manual does say ICH9... Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski