From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: hackbench regression since 2.6.25-rc
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:32:39 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803132328330.24204@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205463842.3215.188.camel@ymzhang>
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> After testing:
> Name Objects Alloc Free %Fast
> :0000192 3428 80093958 80090708 92 8
> :0000512 374 80016030 80015715 68 7
Ahhh... Okay those slabs did not change for 2.6.25-rc. Is there
really a difference to 2.6.24?
> So block 192 and 512's and very active and their fast free percentage is low.
Yes but that is to be expected given that hackbench does allocate objects
and then passes them to other processors for freeing.
Could you get me more details on the two critical slabs?
Do slabinfo -a and then pick one alias for each of those sizes.
Then do
slabinfo skbuff_head (whatever alias you want to use to refer to the slab)
for each of them. Should give some more insight as to how slub behaves
with these two slab caches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-13 7:46 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-13 8:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 9:28 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-13 9:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-14 0:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-14 3:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 3:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 5:28 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 6:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-14 7:29 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-14 6:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-14 7:23 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 21:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-17 7:50 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-17 17:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-18 3:28 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-18 4:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-14 6:32 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-03-14 7:14 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 21:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-15 0:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-17 3:35 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-17 17:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-17 3:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-13 15:14 ` Greg KH
2008-03-13 16:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-03-13 17:12 ` Greg KH
2008-03-14 0:50 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-03-14 5:01 ` Greg KH
2008-03-14 5:32 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0803132328330.24204@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®