From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759673AbYDCTRR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:17:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755124AbYDCTRG (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:17:06 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:59922 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754732AbYDCTRF (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:17:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:14:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , Robin Holt , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Steve Wise , Roland Dreier , Kanoj Sarcar , steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com, Nick Piggin Subject: Re: EMM: Fixup return value handling of emm_notify() In-Reply-To: <1207219246.8514.817.camel@twins> Message-ID: References: <20080401205531.986291575@sgi.com> <20080401205635.793766935@sgi.com> <20080402064952.GF19189@duo.random> <20080402212515.GS19189@duo.random> <1207219246.8514.817.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > It seems to me that common code can be shared using functions? No need > to stuff everything into a single function. We have method vectors all > over the kernel, we could do a_ops as a single callback too, but we > dont. > > FWIW I prefer separate methods. Ok. It seems that I already added some new methods which do not use all parameters. So lets switch back to the old scheme for the next release.