From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752889AbYDGRr2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:47:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751678AbYDGRrV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:47:21 -0400 Received: from extu-mxob-2.symantec.com ([216.10.194.135]:37652 "EHLO extu-mxob-2.symantec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535AbYDGRrV (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:47:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:51:08 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@blonde.site To: James Bottomley cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , Jens Axboe , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix sense_slab/bio swapping livelock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1207524935.3223.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > This was sort of accidentally fixed in scsi-misc by commit > > > > commit c5f73260b289cb974928eac05f2d84e58ddfc020 > > Author: James Bottomley > > Date: Thu Mar 13 11:16:33 2008 -0500 > > > > [SCSI] consolidate command allocation in a single place > > Thanks, yes, that looks a good substitute to me. > > > Could you check that: > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git > > > > and see if it alleviates the problem? ... if so, we can work out which > > pieces to backport. > > Precisely that patch seems appropriate to 2.6.25-rc8-git, so I'm now > running the test with just that applied to 2.6.25-rc8 (plus cfq rcu > fix). Not quite what you asked, but... > > Strictly speaking, it'd take a couple of days to be reasonably sure > that the livelock is gone (it appeared to reproduce quicker once I > moved to -rc8 plus cfq rcu fix; but I'm not entirely convinced that > wasn't just coincidence). But if nothing bad appears overnight, > let's assume your patch is the one to push: I'll report tomorrow. Right, as expected, that seems to run fine: I've seen no problem with it in 17 hours - beyond, of course, all the page allocation failures which will plague such tests until something else is changed. Somewhat irrelevant since Linus put my patch into 2.6.25-rc8-git (probably worth it for the various issues noted in the comment); but reassuring for 2.6.26. I'll stop that test now and put it to work on something else. Hugh