From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932703AbYDVUrm@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932703AbYDVUrm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762759AbYDVUrX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:23 -0400
Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:38393 "HELO xenotime.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1762695AbYDVUrW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
X-X-Sender: rddunlap@shark.he.net
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: kconfig exposing unbuildable driver
In-Reply-To: <20080422204549.GA21435@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804221346470.19817@shark.he.net>
References: <1208895950.24124.9.camel@brick> <20080422203334.GA9809@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804221337550.19817@shark.he.net> <20080422204549.GA21435@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Russell King wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Russell King wrote:
> > 
> > > That was my initial approach as well, which got shot down by Andrew
> > > Morton and others as being unacceptable.
> > 
> > where?
> 
> In private mail.
> 
> > why?
> 
> Well, first I need to gain the permission of Andrew to post his private
> message.  I'm not being subborn here - I _do_ _not_ reproduce private
> messages in public without prior permission.

Sure, understood.

> > Seems like we need to push back on that part.
> 
> Talk to Andrew then.

He is cc-ed (although traveling much this week IIRC).

-- 
~Randy