From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760988AbYDXTlX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:41:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763355AbYDXTkV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:40:21 -0400 Received: from wilson.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.42]:49290 "EHLO wilson.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932196AbYDXTkS (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:40:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:40:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Christoph Hellwig cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24 In-Reply-To: <20080424173626.bcd088e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20080424173626.bcd088e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Status of my local build tests will be at > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next. If maintainers want to give > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add > more builds. For the second day in a row, m68k builds failed because of fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c:527: error: implicit declaration of function 'xfs_icsb_sync_counters_locked' make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.o] Error 1 According to http://www.linux.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00202.html, there's a forward declaration for xfs_icsb_sync_counters_locked() only if HAVE_PERCPU_SB is defined, i.e. for CONFIG_SMP. This break UP architectures. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds