From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758483AbYD2Lsm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755795AbYD2LsR (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:17 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51470 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755491AbYD2LsQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:48:16 -0400 X-Authenticated: #20450766 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19wd0BooYJw5+MJdKbSdlVxEs+h8otg1MRcenj7GH gXl7DLutzJrSrv Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:48:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Ingo Molnar cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] video: fix SOC_CAMERA_MT9M001 build bug In-Reply-To: <20080428201105.GD15840@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080428120032.GA23847@elte.hu> <20080428193130.GC9907@elte.hu> <20080428201105.GD15840@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > sorry, you are right. Mind doing the right patch as you know this code > much better than i do? Mauro, as you've already committed Ingo's patch to your hg tree, what's the best way to fix this? Should a revert be committed, or would you drop that patch? The latter would be better, I guess, but then I better wait for you to do it, then update against your new tree, and then add a correct fix, right? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski