From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753147AbYENUdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:33:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751598AbYENUdp (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:33:45 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:44216 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbYENUdm (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:33:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Matt Mackall cc: Andi Kleen , Pekka Enberg , KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Matthew Wilcox , "Zhang, Yanmin" Subject: Re: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB In-Reply-To: <1210794563.4093.57.camel@calx> Message-ID: References: <20080510030831.796641881@sgi.com> <20080510030919.604216074@sgi.com> <4825709A.2020407@firstfloor.org> <20080510221515.3540a6cc@bree.surriel.com> <2f11576a0805120038s334dc56cuaf16b8b7c6f87098@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020805120054t1370236ei5ff52279457e026e@mail.gmail.com> <482B2617.5010605@firstfloor.org> <1210789112.4093.14.camel@calx> <1210794563.4093.57.camel@calx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2008, Matt Mackall wrote: > > allocator? > > No, slow path here means we're already under memory pressure, so we > don't care if something takes longer if it saves memory. So expire the queues under memory pressure only? Trigger queue cleanup from reclaim?