On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote: > tir, 22 07 2008 kl. 18:44 +0200, skrev Julia Lawall: > > From: Julia Lawall > > > > There is a call to local_irq_restore in the normal exit case, so it would > > seem that there should be one on an error return as well. > > > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > > (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) > > > > // > > @@ > > expression l; > > expression E,E1,E2; > > @@ > > > > local_irq_save(l); > > ... when != local_irq_restore(l) > > when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E,l) > > when any > > when strict > > ( > > if (...) { ... when != local_irq_restore(l) > > when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(E1,l) > > + local_irq_restore(l); > > return ...; > > } > > | > > if (...) > > + {local_irq_restore(l); > > return ...; > > + } > > | > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(E2,l); > > | > > local_irq_restore(l); > > ) > > // > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > > > > --- > > arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 9 +++++++-- > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c > > index 318b811..14e5c99 100644 > > --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c > > +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c > > @@ -125,8 +125,10 @@ void kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void *garbage) > > PAGE_KERNEL)); > > local_irq_save(saved_psr); > > slot = ia64_itr_entry(0x3, KVM_VMM_BASE, pte, KVM_VMM_SHIFT); > > - if (slot < 0) > > + if (slot < 0) { > > + local_irq_restore(saved_psr); > > return; > > + } > > local_irq_restore(saved_psr); > > If this change makes sense, how about merging the two local_irq_restore > calls and put them before the if? And shouldn't your checker be able to > figure this? No, it pretty much only does what it's told, which is to put a local_irq_restore before the return. Since slot is a local variable, it does seem like the call to local_irq_restore could be safely moved upwards, so I will do that instead. thanks, julia