From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754002AbYJPTBu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:01:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754716AbYJPTB1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:01:27 -0400 Received: from 0x55512ece.adsl.cybercity.dk ([85.81.46.206]:23019 "EHLO sko.w0.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754350AbYJPTB0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:01:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:01:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Hans Schou X-X-Sender: linux@sko.w0.dk To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SiS55x, another x86 CPU In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87d4i5rq7i.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20081014060616.GO12131@one.firstfloor.org> <20081015100637.GS12131@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> I think time is up for getting rid of Pine and there stupid license. I'll >> check if "nail" can handle attachment correctly. > > alpine? Well, Gentoo didn't have it and it is probably a "wrong" license. > But, why do you send patches as attachments in the first place? Ingo said I could do so when it was something to do with x86 patches. Anyway, it looks like ^R in Pine did work correctly. > It's recommended to _not_ do that, for easier review. OK. > Pine can handle that fine since ages (I switched from elm to pine 13 or > so years ago). Yes, my so called friends have been bullying me for that long with the Pine license. Mutt is not an option either. /hans