From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756109AbYJVSDz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:03:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752611AbYJVSDq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:03:46 -0400 Received: from nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com ([207.115.36.82]:58280 "EHLO nlpi053.prodigy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751545AbYJVSDq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:03:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:03:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@quilx.com To: Pekka Enberg cc: Cyrill Gorcunov , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC] SLUB - define OO_ macro instead of hardcoded numbers In-Reply-To: <48FF6800.20705@cs.helsinki.fi> Message-ID: References: <20081022161836.GG9639@localhost> <20081022163530.GH9639@localhost> <20081022165354.GI9639@localhost> <20081022172103.GJ9639@localhost> <48FF6800.20705@cs.helsinki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Maybe call the page->objects maximum MAX_OBJS_PER_PAGE as it's not strictly > related to the other OO code? Yes. Sounds good.