From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754637AbYKSTTA (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:19:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755241AbYKSTSn (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:18:43 -0500 Received: from nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com ([207.115.36.82]:39202 "EHLO nlpi053.prodigy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755231AbYKSTSm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:18:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:18:17 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@quilx.com To: Stephen Rothwell cc: Alexey Dobriyan , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Haavard Skinnemoen Subject: Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree patch (Was: Re: next-20081106: undefined reference to `__per_cpu_start') In-Reply-To: <20081118153346.62bf9c11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20081106173645.e7e79071.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081106183939.GA26925@x200.localdomain> <20081107162114.2a41c623.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081118153346.62bf9c11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I have applied this to linux-next today. It is not clear to me if this > is a fix for the cpu_alloc tree or the zero-based per_cpu area patches or > a combination of both. If the first, please apply this to the cpu_alloc > tree or I will have to drop the tree. Otherwise, let me know where it > belongs. Its a fix to the cpu_alloc stuff. > Also, considering the "discussions" between Rusty and yourself, I may > need to drop the cpu_alloc tree until they are resolved. Just came back from the conference. Hope I can catch up with email soon.