[PATCH 10/12] fs/xfs: Correct redundant test

[Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>]

From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>

bp was tested for NULL a few lines before, followed by a return, and there
is no intervening modification of its value.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@r exists@
local idexpression x;
expression E;
position p1,p2;
@@

if (x == NULL || ...) { ... when forall
   return ...; }
... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
(
*x == NULL
|
*x != NULL
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c              |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
index 8ee2f8c..218829e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
 			return (flags & XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK) ?
 					EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
 
-		if ((bp != NULL) && (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0)) {
+		if (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0) {
 			xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_trans_read_buf", mp,
 					  bp, blkno);
 			error = XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp);
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
 			return error;
 		}
 #ifdef DEBUG
-		if (xfs_do_error && (bp != NULL)) {
+		if (xfs_do_error) {
 			if (xfs_error_target == target) {
 				if (((xfs_req_num++) % xfs_error_mod) == 0) {
 					xfs_buf_relse(bp);