mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] core: add a function to safely try to get device driver owner
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:54:10 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011292147540.27962@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129131737.3dd6eb03@bike.lwn.net>

Hi Jon

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:43:28 +0100 (CET)
> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > When two drivers interoperate without an explicit dependency, it is often
> > required to prevent one of them from being unloaded safely by dereferencing
> > dev->driver->owner. This patch provides a generic function to do this in a
> > race-free way.
> 
> I must ask: why not, instead, make the dependency explicit?  In
> particular, this looks like an application for the proposed media
> controller code, which is meant to model the connections between otherwise
> independent devices.  The fact that your example comes from V4L2 (which is
> the current domain of the media controller) also argues that way.

Sorry, don't see a good way to do this. This function is for a general 
dependency, where you don't have that driver, we are checking for register 
with us, so, the only way to get to it is via dev->driver->owner. And I 
also don't want to move registering the device into the dependant driver 
and then wait (with a timeout) for a driver to probe with it... I just 
want to verify, whether a driver has attached to that device and whether I 
can lock it down.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-29 19:43 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-29 19:56 ` Greg KH
2010-11-29 20:11   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-29 20:17 ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-11-29 20:54   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
2010-11-29 21:41     ` Greg KH
2010-11-29 22:10       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-29 22:28         ` Jonathan Corbet
2010-11-30  7:18           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-29 22:32         ` Greg KH
2010-11-29 23:11           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-30 16:56             ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 17:09               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-11-30 17:15                 ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 17:55                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-11-30 18:32                     ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 20:43                       ` Laurent Pinchart
2010-11-30 20:55                         ` Greg KH
2010-11-30 22:19                         ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1011292147540.27962@axis700.grange \
    --to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®